Assessment of Swallowing 2023 Questions and Answers Complete

screening, clinical evaluation, and instrumental evaluation – What are the 3 ways one
can assess swallowing?
screening – given broadly to groups of people to determine if any of them have the
condition in question (pass/fail)

  • easy to administer, inexpensive, accuracy; high sensitivity, low specificity
    high sensitivity = few false negative results; should help rule out the disorder
    low specificity = identify more patients than have the disorder – Explain what high
    sensitivity and low specificity means with screening.
    no, (e.g., nurse may do this) – Is it only SLP’s who can do a swallow screening?
  1. Risk of pneumonia is 11 times higher for patients with severe dysphagia and
    aspiration
  2. Hospitals using mandatory and formal dysphagia screening have lower pneumonia
    rates than those without a screening
  3. Health incentive and financial incentive to screen high risk patients – Why do we do
    swallow screenings? (3)
    To determine:
  4. The likelihood that dysphagia is present
  5. The need for formal swallow evaluation
  6. Whether it is safe to feed the patient orally (for the purposes of nutrition, hydration,
    and administration of medication)
  7. Whether the patient requires referral for nutritional or hydrational support – What are
    the goals of a swallow screening? (4)
  8. A known history of dysphagia
  9. A medical diagnosis that frequently involves swallowing impairment (e.g., stroke)
  10. Reduced level of consciousness
  11. Overt signs of difficulty swallowing or aspiration
  12. Complaints of difficulty swallowing – Screening procedures are usually used to
    determine whether any of the following represent a risk of dysphagia and/or a reason to
    maintain an NPO status for the patient: …? (5)
  13. Interview or questionnaire
  14. Observation of the signs and symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia
  15. Formulation of appropriate recommendations, including the need for a full swallow
    function assessment
  16. Communication of results and recommendations to the team responsible for the
    individual’s care – What compromises a screening? (4)
    Speech-language pathologists
    Nurses
    Physicians
    Others
    Screening requires little examiner expertise or interpretation – Who should screen?
  17. The Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (TOR-BSST)
  • Health care professionals
  1. Gugging Swallowing Screen
  • SLPs
  1. Massey Bedside Swallowing Screening
  • Nurse administered
  1. Modified Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA)
  • Physician administered (Neurologist) – What are the different types of screening
    tools? Who are they typically used with?
  • Widely used clinical screening to determine the risk of aspiration
  • Patients are given 3 ounces of water and asked to drink the entire amount
  • Not appropriate for every patient – Describe the 3 Ounce Water Swallow Test.
    inability to consume the entire 3 ounces or coughing or throat clearing within 1 minute of
    test administration – How does one fail the 3 ounce water swallow test?
  1. Orientation and command following
    What is your name?
    Where are you right now?
    What year is it?
  2. Command following
    Done in conjunction with oral‐mechanism exam
    Open your mouth
    Stick out your tongue
    Smile
  3. 3‐ounce water swallow test (part of the Yale Swallow Protocol) – Describe the Yale
    Swallow Protocol and it’s 3 parts.
    screening = pass/fail (e.g., 3 ounce water test)
    clinical = more in depth assessment (e.g., beside swallow eval.)
    instrumental = using an instrument (e.g., FEES) – What is the difference between
    screening, clinical, and instrumental?
    Clinical evaluation – the initial form of testing performed by physicians and establishes
    the patient-clinician relationship; same for the SLP

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top