AICP Exam Prep 3.0 Questions With Complete Solutions

  1. The New York Court of Appeals case Golden v. Planning
    Board of Town of Ramapo (1972) resulted in an important
    decision in what area?
    a. Exclusionary housing
    b. Growth management
    c. “Takings” claims
    d. Environmental justice correct answer: B. Ramapo, NY
    established a growth management system that awarded points to
    development proposals based on the availability of public
    utilities, drainage facilities, parks, road access, and firehouses.
  2. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 required local
    governments to address potential hazards in a Hazard Mitigation
    Plan in order to remain eligible to receive certain federal funds
    before and following federally-declared disasters. Your
    community has integrated such a plan into the General Plan.
    Now the Safety Element of the General Plan is expanded to
    cover the following: I. Natural hazards II. Man-made hazards
    III. Fiscal responsibility for disasters IV. A development retreat
    from low-lying coastal areas
    a. II & III
    b. I, II, & IV
    c. I & IV
    d. I, II, III, & IV correct answer: B. FEMA HMA of 2000 seeks
    to expand pre-disaster planning to precipitate the widespread
    loss of life, damage to property, infrastructure and the
    1 / 4
    environment. The Act does not assign any fiscal responsibilities
    of disasters to any entity. Most local Safety Element covers also
    man-made hazards. However, local jurisdictions are not
    burdened with the fiscal impact associated with disasters.
  3. In the United States, the “Neighborhood Unit” concept is
    attributed to:
    a. Kevin Lynch
    b. Clarence Perry
    c. Ian McHarg
    d. Lewis Mumford correct answer: B. Clarence Perry lived in
    Forest Hills Gardens in Queens, NY and published an essay on
    the concept of the neighborhood unit in 1929. Forest Hill
    Gardens, developed by Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. in 1911,
    inspired the neighborhood unit concept. Perry defined a
    neighborhood as a self-contained area within a 5-minute walking
    radius, bounded by major streets with shops at the intersections
    and a school in the middle. Kevin Lynch wrote Image of the
    City in 1960. Ian McHarg wrote Design with Nature in 1969.
    Lewis Mumford wrote Culture of Cities in 1929.
  4. Which of the following court cases is/are concerned with
    takings? I. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) II.
    Associated Homebuilders v. City of Livermore (1976) III. First
    English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles
    (1987) IV. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992)
    a. I only
    b. I & II
    c. I & III
    d. I, III, & IV correct answer: D. In Nollan v. California Coastal
    Commission (1987), the state claimed that the Nollan’s proposed
    2 / 4
    house would interfere with visual and psychological access to
    the public beach. The state said that the Nollan’s would be
    granted a building permit only if they allowed public access to
    the beach. The court said this was a taking because if the state
    wanted to provide access to the beach it should use the power of
    eminent domain and compensate the land owners. In First
    English (1987), a church had not been allowed to use its
    property temporarily because it had been flooded; the court said
    that the city must provide compensation for this taking, even
    though it was only temporary. In Lucas, the court found that a
    South Carolina state law which prohibited Lucas from building
    on two lots on a barrier island was a taking because it deprived
    Lucas of all economically viable use of the property. The
    Associated Homebuilders v. City of Livermore (1976) case was
    about growth management. In that case, the court said it was
    permissible to phase growth to allow for relief of overcrowded
    schools and sewer treatment facilities and to increase water
    reserves.
  5. Ebenezer Howard is best known for promoting self-sufficient
    towns with mixed economies known as:
    a. New towns
    b. Planned unit developments
    c. Garden cities
    d. Suburbs correct answer: C. Ebenezer Howard, (1850-1920)
    published Tomorrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform in 1898;
    it was reissued as Garden Cities of Tomorrow in 1902. A garden
    city included about 6,000 acres of land and was surrounded with
    a rural belt. The first garden cities were in England: Letchworth
    in 1903 and Welwyn Garden in 1919. New Towns are a
    successor to garden cities. The New Towns of Columbia, MD
    3 / 4
    and Reston, VA were built in the United States after World War
    II. A Planned Unit Development or PUD is planned and
    developed as a single entity containing residential and nonresidential development such as public, commercial or industrial
    areas. PUDs allow for greater flexibility in locating buildings,
    combining land uses, and including open space than traditional
    development patterns. Suburban developments are located on
    the periphery of urban areas and are not associated with
    Ebenezer Howard. Riverside, IL is considered the earliest
    example of suburban development. Riverside is located outside
    of Chicago and was developed in 1868 by Frederick Law
    Olmsted, Sr.
  6. Which of the following is a landmark housing case?
    a. Hadacheck v. Sebastian (1915)
    b. Berman v. Parker (1954):
    c. Southern Burlington NAACP v. Township of Mt. Laurel
    (1975)
    d. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926) correct
    answer: C. Southern Burlington NAACP v. Township of Mt.
    Laurel came before the New Jersey Supreme Court. In the 1975
    decision, the court required that a township provide the
    opportunity for low-income housing development through the
    zoning ordinance. A second case, known as Mount Laurel II,
    came before the court in 1983; this time, the courts instructed
    townships to provide their fair share of low-income housing,
    which led the New Jersey legislature to pass the Fair Housing
    Act in 1985. Hadacheck v. Sebastian considered whether some
    restrictions on activities in a brickyard in Los Angeles
    constituted a taking; the Supreme Court ruled that the
    restrictions did not constitute a taking. Berman v. Parker

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top