What makes objectivism different from emotivism?
Click or tap a choice to answer the question. Objectivism says that moral claims do not attempt to influence the attitudes and behaviors of others. Objectivism says that moral claims do not express emotion; emotivism says they do. Objectivism says that moral claims can be known with certainty; emotivism does not.
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is:
Objectivism says that moral claims can be known with certainty; emotivism does not.
Explanation:
Objectivism and emotivism are two distinct ethical theories that address the nature of moral claims, but they differ in key ways, particularly in how they understand the role of moral statements and their relationship to emotions, facts, and objective reality.
Objectivism holds that moral claims are objective and can be known with certainty. This means that moral truths exist independently of human feelings or opinions. According to objectivism, there are universal moral facts that are true regardless of individual or cultural beliefs. For example, an objectivist might argue that “murder is wrong” is an objective fact that is true for all people at all times, irrespective of personal preferences or emotions. Objectivism is often associated with moral realism, which posits that ethical truths are discovered through reason, observation, or logical analysis.
Emotivism, on the other hand, is a form of non-cognitivism, which holds that moral statements do not describe objective facts or truths but instead express the emotional responses of the speaker. When someone says, “Murder is wrong,” an emotivist would argue that they are not stating a fact but rather expressing their personal disapproval or negative emotional reaction to murder. Emotivism asserts that moral statements are more about influencing attitudes and behaviors than about communicating objective truths. As a result, there is no moral fact to be known with certainty, as moral judgments are subjective and dependent on the emotional responses of individuals.
In summary, objectivism asserts that moral claims are objective and knowable with certainty, while emotivism maintains that moral claims are expressions of emotion and are not objectively true. This distinction highlights the key difference: objectivism believes in the existence of moral facts, whereas emotivism does not.