Question 17 The Crawford v. Honig case O extended the ban on testing for African American children to Hispanic children. Olifted the ban on Intelligence Testing for African American children. Oreaffirmed the Larry P. case. strengthened the ban on intelligence testing for African American Children.
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is: D. strengthened the ban on intelligence testing for African American children.
Explanation:
The Crawford v. Honig case (1994) was a significant legal decision concerning the use of intelligence tests for African American children in educational settings. The case arose in response to concerns over the biased use of intelligence testing, particularly the overrepresentation of African American students in special education programs for students with mental disabilities. Historically, intelligence tests had been criticized for their cultural bias, as they were often designed in ways that were not culturally neutral and tended to favor certain ethnic groups over others, particularly white children.
In the earlier Larry P. v. Riles case (1979), a federal judge had ruled that the use of IQ tests to place African American children in special education programs in California was discriminatory. This ruling specifically banned the use of intelligence tests for African American children in California public schools, asserting that such tests were racially biased and inaccurate in assessing the intellectual potential of African American children. The Larry P. case was part of a broader movement to address racial discrimination in educational practices.
The Crawford v. Honig case dealt with an extension of this issue. The court in this case reinforced the earlier ruling in Larry P. and made a key decision regarding the expansion of protections. The Crawford case specifically focused on whether the ban on intelligence testing for African American children should be extended to Hispanic children as well. The court found that Hispanic children were similarly affected by biases in intelligence testing and ruled that the protections under the Larry P. case should be extended to them. This decision strengthened the ban on intelligence testing for African American children, as well as further protected Hispanic children from potentially biased testing practices.
In essence, the Crawford v. Honig case was crucial in solidifying the stance against racially biased intelligence testing and safeguarding the rights of minority students in the educational system.