Assess the literary merit of “The Outside.” Should it be adopted as a part of the canon? Provide your own working definition of literary merit and apply that definition to the play, providing textual support for your assertions. Your answer should be one paragraph in length.
The Correct Answer and Explanation is :
Literary Merit: Literary merit refers to the enduring quality of a work based on its artistic value, thematic depth, and ability to evoke thought, emotion, and intellectual engagement. It is a combination of craftsmanship in writing, significance in cultural or historical context, and a lasting impact on readers or society.
Assessment of “The Outside”: “The Outside” by Susan H. Lyman, in the context of literary merit, reveals significant thematic depth and a reflection of human experiences in the face of societal rejection and isolation. Its portrayal of characters struggling with alienation, as well as the language used to express these feelings, exhibits the emotional complexity essential to literary merit. The play’s exploration of themes such as identity, belonging, and the societal pressures that influence individuals elevates it beyond mere entertainment, positioning it as a work capable of sparking deeper intellectual reflection. In particular, the stark contrast between the inner world of the protagonist and the harsh external environment serves as a powerful commentary on human resilience and self-awareness. The careful development of tension, use of symbolism, and dialogue that captures both the fragility and strength of the human spirit contribute to its lasting relevance. Although not as widely known as some classics, “The Outside” should be considered for the canon due to its skillful portrayal of psychological depth and its relevance in understanding the human condition in a world full of external judgment and internal strife.
Explanation (300 words):
“The Outside” excels in multiple facets of literary merit, primarily through its exploration of complex psychological and emotional landscapes. In defining literary merit, I focus on three elements: thematic depth, emotional resonance, and intellectual engagement. Lyman’s work satisfies these criteria through its exploration of isolation and the stark contrast between internal desires and external societal pressures. The central theme of alienation is presented in a nuanced manner, capturing the inner turmoil of individuals marginalized by societal standards. The protagonist’s journey is compelling not only because of the struggles they face but because it invites the audience to reflect on their own experiences of exclusion or fear of being misunderstood.
The play’s use of symbolism—such as the motif of “the outside”—adds layers to its thematic structure. “The outside” does not only represent a physical world but also embodies emotional isolation and the psychological effects of feeling disconnected. The characters’ development throughout the play reflects their evolving awareness of both their personal worth and the constraints imposed by the world around them. The subtle yet powerful dialogue underscores the resilience and vulnerability of the human spirit, drawing out empathy from the audience.
Though it may not be as widely studied as some canonical works, “The Outside” contains the qualities of lasting literary significance: it encourages reflection, evokes emotional responses, and remains relevant to contemporary societal issues. This makes it a candidate worthy of further consideration for inclusion in the literary canon.