How does Gibb respond to Broderick’s argument?
- A. by insisting on the need for more jobs
- B. by challenging the direction of the discussion
- C. by questioning the validity of evidence presented
- D. by calling for the cost of streetcars to be further researched
The correct answer and explanation
iturn0image1In the Broderick City Council Meeting, Suzanne Gibb responds to Sam Broderick’s proposals by challenging the direction of the discussion, making option B the correct answer. While Broderick advocates for initiatives like bike lanes, new zoning laws, and the reintroduction of streetcars to promote exercise, reduce pollution, and revitalize the community, Gibb shifts the focus to more immediate concerns. She emphasizes that the city’s priorities should include addressing unemployment, poverty, and the maintenance of existing infrastructure. Gibb questions the practicality and financial viability of implementing streetcars, pointing out their high costs and uncertain usage rates. She suggests that resources would be better allocated toward creating permanent manufacturing jobs and improving current roadways. By redirecting the conversation from Broderick’s proposed transportation projects to pressing economic and infrastructural issues, Gibb effectively challenges the original direction of the discussion.