One interpretation of Solomon’s account of unrequited love suggests
a.
that infatuation is a natural extension of unrequited love.
b.
that infatuation is completely distinct from unrequited love.
c.
that infatuation and unrequited love and one and the same.
d.
(a) & (c)
The correct answer and explanation is :
The correct answer is (a) & (c) — “that infatuation is a natural extension of unrequited love” and “that infatuation and unrequited love are one and the same.”
Explanation:
In Solomon’s account of unrequited love, he explores the emotional complexities of being in love with someone who does not reciprocate those feelings. Unrequited love, by definition, refers to a situation where one person has strong romantic feelings for someone who does not return those feelings. Infatuation is often associated with intense emotions and an overwhelming desire for the object of one’s affection, and it can easily evolve into unrequited love.
Infatuation as a natural extension of unrequited love:
Solomon suggests that infatuation is not just a fleeting or superficial feeling but can often develop into a deeper emotional experience. When one experiences unrequited love, it’s common to feel a range of intense emotions such as longing, desire, and obsession. These feelings can be understood as an extension of infatuation because they often stem from an idealized or imagined connection with the other person. In unrequited love, the emotional investment grows stronger despite the lack of reciprocation, and this emotional investment can be characterized by infatuation.
Infatuation and unrequited love as one and the same:
From another perspective, Solomon might suggest that infatuation and unrequited love are essentially the same in the context of emotionally intense experiences. Unrequited love is typically marked by obsessive thoughts, longing, and intense emotional dependence on the object of affection, all of which are also key features of infatuation. The two concepts are often intertwined, as unrequited love frequently involves being infatuated with someone who does not return that affection. Therefore, in this context, it can be argued that both infatuation and unrequited love are essentially one and the same, as they are both driven by intense, unreciprocated emotions.
Thus, both options (a) and (c) hold true in understanding Solomon’s interpretation, as they emphasize the connection between infatuation and unrequited love.