PLZ PLZ HELP Use “odious good taste” and “trifling with” in two different sentences.
PLZ PLZ HELP Use “odious good taste” and “trifling with” in two different sentences.
The Correct Answer and Explanation is:
Sentences:
- The critic’s insistence on “odious good taste” made the vibrant, unconventional artwork seem lifeless and dull.
- He was accused of trifling with her emotions, never intending to commit but always keeping her hopes alive.
Explanation
The two phrases—“odious good taste” and “trifling with”—carry distinct but powerful connotations and are used in different contexts.
1. “Odious good taste”:
This phrase is an oxymoron, where “odious” means extremely unpleasant or repulsive, while “good taste” typically refers to refined or socially acceptable aesthetic judgment. When combined, “odious good taste” is often used sarcastically or critically to describe an overly refined or pretentious sense of aesthetics that suppresses creativity or individuality. In the sentence provided, the critic’s “odious good taste” is portrayed as something that stifles artistic freedom. Instead of appreciating the boldness and originality of the artwork, the critic demands conformity to rigid standards, making the art feel dull. The phrase suggests that what is considered “tasteful” can sometimes be overly judgmental or exclusionary, thus turning “good taste” into something unpleasant—hence, odious.
2. “Trifling with”:
To “trifle with” something means to treat it without seriousness or with a lack of respect, especially when it deserves care or commitment. The phrase is often used in emotional or romantic contexts, like in the example sentence, where someone is “trifling with her emotions.” This suggests manipulation or carelessness—he plays with her feelings without any genuine intention of reciprocation. This usage highlights the emotional damage caused by someone who acts insincerely or casually in a situation that should be treated with seriousness.
In summary, both phrases criticize behavior: “odious good taste” critiques overly rigid standards disguised as refinement, while “trifling with” condemns emotional irresponsibility. They are effective in nuanced, often literary or formal contexts.
