In a technical report which of these must be avoided? Select one: a. Facts b. Logical Conclusion c. Objective Evaluation d. Subjective Evaluation
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is d. Subjective Evaluation.
In a technical report, the emphasis is on presenting information that is clear, precise, and verifiable. This type of report is meant to communicate technical data or analysis in an objective and factual manner. Subjective evaluations, which are based on personal opinions, feelings, or biases, can undermine the integrity and credibility of the report. The primary goal is to provide information that can be evaluated based on evidence, rather than personal interpretation or feelings.
To elaborate further, a technical report should be based on the following:
- Facts: These are pieces of verifiable information that are supported by evidence or data. Facts are objective and can be backed up with reliable sources, measurements, or documented observations.
- Logical Conclusion: A technical report typically involves drawing conclusions based on the analysis of facts and data. These conclusions should follow a logical process and be grounded in the evidence presented in the report.
- Objective Evaluation: This involves assessing the facts without bias. An objective evaluation focuses on the data and ensures that personal preferences or subjective views do not influence the findings or recommendations. The goal is to maintain fairness and neutrality.
However, subjective evaluation involves opinions, personal feelings, or perspectives that are not universally verifiable. For example, statements like “This solution is the best option because I feel it is the most efficient” are subjective and cannot be proven or substantiated in the same way that facts or objective evaluations can. Including subjective evaluations can cause the report to lose credibility, as readers might question the impartiality of the findings.
In conclusion, technical reports must maintain objectivity to ensure that the information is clear, credible, and based on verifiable data. Subjective evaluations should therefore be avoided to preserve the report’s professionalism and scientific integrity.