Controlling how questions are asked is governed under
A. jury litigation.
B. rules of evidence.
C. judicial administration.
D. rules of legal conduct.
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is B. rules of evidence.
In the context of a trial, controlling how questions are asked is governed by the rules of evidence. These rules are a set of legal standards that dictate what evidence can be presented in court and how it can be introduced. They ensure that the trial process is fair and that the jury or judge only hears relevant, reliable, and legally admissible information.
The rules of evidence cover many aspects of questioning during a trial. For example, they set out how witnesses can be questioned during direct and cross-examination. Certain types of questions may be considered objectionable under these rules, such as leading questions, which suggest an answer or improperly influence the witness. These questions are not allowed during direct examination but may be acceptable during cross-examination.
Furthermore, the rules help prevent the introduction of hearsay evidence, which is testimony about statements made by others outside of court. Hearsay is generally inadmissible because it is not subject to cross-examination and may not be reliable. In addition, the rules also determine how witnesses are qualified to testify on particular subjects, ensuring that only experts provide opinions in areas they are qualified to speak on.
The aim of the rules of evidence is to preserve the integrity of the legal process, providing a clear framework that minimizes confusion and reduces the potential for bias or unfair treatment. They ensure that questions asked in court serve to uncover the truth without misleading the court, ensuring justice is served in a fair and orderly manner.
This is why the rules of evidence are essential in maintaining proper legal procedure during trials.