Controlling how questions are asked is governed under
A) rules of evidence.
B) rules of legal conduct.
C jury litigation.
D) judicial administration.
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is A) rules of evidence.
In legal settings, controlling how questions are asked during trials or hearings is governed by the rules of evidence. These rules ensure that the information presented in court is relevant, reliable, and fair to all parties involved. They help determine what type of questions can be asked, how they should be phrased, and what kind of evidence is admissible.
The primary purpose of the rules of evidence is to maintain order and fairness in the courtroom. They prevent attorneys from asking leading questions or introducing improper evidence that could sway the jury or judge unjustly. For example, some questions may be deemed irrelevant or based on hearsay, which means they are inadmissible. Additionally, questions that may lead to unfair prejudice or confuse the issues at hand are also restricted.
The rules of evidence also serve to protect the rights of witnesses and ensure that they are not subjected to overly aggressive or biased questioning. For instance, cross-examination questions must focus on the issues at hand and cannot be used to intimidate or harass witnesses. These rules are structured to promote transparency, accuracy, and fairness throughout the trial process.
In contrast, rules of legal conduct (option B) govern the professional behavior of lawyers and other legal practitioners, ensuring ethical standards are followed in the courtroom. Jury litigation (option C) refers to legal proceedings involving a jury, but it does not directly govern the questioning process. Judicial administration (option D) refers to the overall management of court processes and systems, not specifically to how questions are asked in court.
Thus, the rules of evidence are the main guidelines for controlling how questions are posed in legal proceedings.