Controlling how questions are asked is governed under
A) rules of evidence.
B) rules of legal conduct.
C) judicial administration.
D) jury litigation.
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is A) rules of evidence.
The rules governing how questions are asked in legal proceedings fall under the “rules of evidence.” These rules are designed to ensure that only relevant, reliable, and legally admissible information is presented in court. The purpose is to protect the integrity of the trial process, ensuring fairness and preventing the introduction of information that could unfairly prejudice the jury or mislead the judge.
The rules of evidence dictate the type of questions that may be asked, how they should be phrased, and what objections can be raised in response to certain lines of questioning. For example, questions that lead the witness or attempt to introduce hearsay (statements made outside of the court that are offered as evidence) are generally not allowed. The rules also address the use of documents, physical evidence, and expert testimony.
In trial settings, attorneys must adhere to these rules when framing their questions to witnesses. If a question violates any of the rules, opposing counsel may object, and the judge will decide whether to allow the question to stand. For instance, an attorney might object to a question if it is overly broad, irrelevant, or designed to confuse the witness.
While B) rules of legal conduct refer to the ethical and professional standards lawyers must follow, and C) judicial administration concerns the management of court processes and proceedings, D) jury litigation relates more to the jury’s role in the trial and does not govern how questions are posed in court.
Therefore, the rules of evidence are the framework that controls how legal questions should be asked in a courtroom.