Complete the analogy.
arrogant is to modest as feeble is to
strong
power
frail
vain
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is strong.
To understand this analogy, it is important to first recognize the relationship between “arrogant” and “modest.” These two words are opposites. Arrogance refers to a person who is overly self-important and believes they are superior to others, while modesty refers to someone who is humble and not boastful about their own abilities or qualities. The relationship between these two words is one of contrast or antonyms.
Similarly, in the second part of the analogy, the relationship between “feeble” and the correct choice, “strong,” is one of opposites. “Feeble” refers to something weak, lacking strength, or fragile. It describes a person, object, or condition that is frail or not powerful. On the other hand, “strong” describes something that possesses strength, power, or robustness.
The other choices, “power,” “frail,” and “vain,” are not the correct opposite of “feeble.” “Power” is related to strength but is not directly an antonym of “feeble.” “Frail” means delicate or weak, which is a synonym for “feeble,” not an opposite. “Vain” refers to someone excessively self-centered, much like “arrogant,” but it does not connect directly with “feeble.”
Thus, just as “arrogant” is to “modest,” “feeble” is to “strong,” forming a pair of contrasting terms.