The Correct Answer and Explanation is:
Based on the scenario provided, the correct answer is that Paula should have done nothing differently, as she followed the correct standard procedure.
Explanation:
Paula’s actions were entirely correct and align perfectly with standard infection control and first aid protocols for a healthcare setting. There is nothing she should have done differently.
Her response can be broken down into key, correct steps. First, she identified the bleeding and immediately washed her hands. This is the crucial first step in standard precautions to prevent the spread of infection. By performing hand hygiene before touching the patient or donning gloves, she minimized the risk of introducing any pathogens into the patient’s open wound.
Next, she put on gloves. This is the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Gloves create a vital barrier, protecting Paula from potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens and simultaneously protecting the patient’s vulnerable surgical site from any germs. Her use of gauze to apply direct, gentle pressure is the standard and most effective first aid technique to control minor bleeding. This action helps to promote clotting and stop the blood flow without causing further injury to the site. Using a substance like alcohol would have been a mistake, as it can damage tissue and impede healing.
Finally, after finishing her care task, she properly removed her contaminated gloves and washed her hands a second time. This concluding hand hygiene step is just as important as the first. It ensures that any potential contaminants from the patient encounter or from the process of removing the gloves are completely removed, preventing cross contamination to herself, the environment, or other patients. Every step Paula took demonstrated a thorough understanding of patient safety, hygiene, and basic medical care. Her conduct was exemplary, and no correction was needed.
