How would one convert 125 lb to kilograms (1 oz = 28 g)

How would one convert 125 lb to kilograms (1 oz = 28 g)?
16 OZ 28 g

O A. 125 lbx x

1 lb 1 oz

B. 125 bx

28 g

1 oz

16 oz

C. 125 | Ý

1 lb

X

28 g 1 kg

X

1 oz 1000 g

28 g

D. 125 lb x

X

1 kg

1000 g

1 oz

The Correct Answer and Explanation is :

To convert 125 pounds (lb) to kilograms (kg), we can follow these steps:

  1. Understand the relationship between pounds and ounces:
  • There are 16 ounces (oz) in 1 pound (lb).
  1. Understand the conversion from ounces to grams:
  • We know that 1 ounce is equivalent to 28 grams (g).
  1. Convert pounds to ounces:
  • First, convert 125 lb to ounces:
    [
    125 \text{ lb} \times 16 \text{ oz/lb} = 2000 \text{ oz}
    ]
  1. Convert ounces to grams:
  • Now convert 2000 ounces to grams:
    [
    2000 \text{ oz} \times 28 \text{ g/oz} = 56000 \text{ g}
    ]
  1. Convert grams to kilograms:
  • Finally, convert grams to kilograms, noting that 1 kilogram is equal to 1000 grams:
    [
    56000 \text{ g} \div 1000 \text{ g/kg} = 56 \text{ kg}
    ]

So, 125 lb is approximately 56 kg.

Explanation of the Options:

  • Option A:
    [
    125 \text{ lb} \times 1 \text{ lb} \times \text{(not a complete conversion)}
    ]
    This does not complete the conversion process correctly.
  • Option B:
    [
    125 \text{ lb} \times \frac{28 \text{ g}}{1 \text{ oz}} \text{(not properly set up)}
    ]
    This misses the step of converting lb to oz first, making it incorrect.
  • Option C:
    [
    125 \times \frac{1 \text{ lb}}{28 \text{ g}} \times \frac{1 \text{ kg}}{1000 \text{ g}} \text{ (incorrect)}
    ]
    The setup is wrong since it incorrectly places the units and doesn’t follow the correct conversion path.
  • Option D:
    [
    125 \text{ lb} \times \frac{1 \text{ kg}}{1000 \text{ g}} \times \frac{28 \text{ g}}{1 \text{ oz}} \text{(not valid)}
    ]
    This option is also not correctly structured.

Correct Method:
The correct conversion method involves breaking down the units in a logical order and multiplying through the unit conversions. None of the options provided accurately reflect the correct calculations, as shown above, leading to 56 kg as the final result.

Scroll to Top