What is the purpose of Kelley’s rhetorical
questions, underlined on pages 3 and 4?
They clarify the distinctions between child labor
laws in Georgia and New Jersey.
They accuse the legislature of not doing their job.
They make a connection between women’s
suffrage and child labor.
They emphasize the influence of teachers in
Georgia.
The Correct Answer and Explanation is :
The correct answer is “They accuse the legislature of not doing their job.”
Explanation
Kelley’s rhetorical questions on pages 3 and 4 serve as a powerful tool to critique the inaction of the legislature regarding child labor laws. By posing questions rather than providing direct statements, Kelley engages her audience in a way that encourages them to think critically about the issues at hand. Rhetorical questions are designed to provoke thought rather than elicit direct answers, and they can underscore the speaker’s point more effectively than straightforward assertions.
In this context, Kelley highlights the apparent negligence of lawmakers in addressing the needs and protections of child workers. By asking questions like “Why are we allowing children to suffer in these conditions?” she draws attention to the moral obligation of the legislature to act on behalf of vulnerable populations. These questions not only challenge the legislative body’s competence but also invite readers to consider the implications of such inaction. Kelley effectively emphasizes that the failure to legislate adequately on child labor reflects a broader disregard for the well-being of children and the ethical responsibility of those in power.
Furthermore, by framing her arguments through rhetorical questions, Kelley is able to convey a sense of urgency and frustration. This method engages readers emotionally, prompting them to reflect on their values and the societal consequences of legislative inaction. Overall, Kelley’s rhetorical questions serve to underline the gravity of the situation concerning child labor, making it clear that the legislature’s failure to act is not just a political oversight but a moral failing that must be addressed. Thus, these questions are pivotal in her argument, driving home the point that the legislature is indeed not fulfilling its responsibilities towards protecting children.