In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work

In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button.

Original Source Material

Student Version

Analysis of patterns in time (APT) is a method for gathering information about observable phenomena such that probabilities of temporal patterns of events can be estimated empirically. If appropriate sampling strategies are employed, temporal patterns can be predicted from APT results. Finally, APT is compared to the linear models approach and event history analysis. The major difference is that in APT there is no mathematical model assumed to characterize relations among variables. In APT the model is the temporal pattern being investigated.

References:
Frick, T. (1990). Analysis of Patterns in Time (APT): A Method of Recording and Quantifying Temporal Relations in Education. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 180-204.

APT is an empirical approach to observing and coding phenomena by using mutually exclusive and exhaustive categories within multiple classifications (Frick, 1990). Once these data have been collected, researchers specify APT queries to calculate the probability of joint and/or sequential patterns of interest. In effect, researchers create measures of temporal patterns by counting the occurrences of these coded patterns. According to Frick, Analysis of Patterns in Time is different from the linear models approach of measuring variables separately and using statistics to analyse their relations.

References:
Frick, T. (1990). Analysis of Patterns in Time (APT): A Method of Recording and Quantifying Temporal Relations in Education. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 180-204.

Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

Word-for-Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

What is the idea behind the question..?
Topic Identifying the type of plagiarism in student work based on given source material
What is this question about..? This question relates to identifying the type of plagiarism in a given case. The question provides both original source material and a student’s work. Students are required to select the appropriate radio button that describes the type of plagiarism, whether it is copy-pasting, paraphrasing, or patchwork plagiarism.

The Correct Answer and Explanation is :

The correct answer for the given situation is Paraphrasing plagiarism.

Explanation:

In this case, the student version of the text clearly takes content directly from the original source material but rewords it without proper citation of the original author. This is a classic example of paraphrasing plagiarism, which occurs when someone rewords or rephrases ideas from a source but does not sufficiently transform the content to be considered original or fail to cite it properly.

The student version rephrases the original text using different wording, but the ideas and structure are essentially the same as the source material. The student also fails to put the text in their own unique voice or critically engage with it, instead simply restating what is presented in the original. Despite using different wording, the student’s work still reflects the same ideas and meaning as the original passage, with little modification to create a new perspective or deeper analysis.

Although the student has provided a citation (Frick, 1990) at the end of the work, the issue lies in the fact that the student does not sufficiently paraphrase or put the ideas into their own words in a way that adds their own analysis or insight. Furthermore, simply rewording or rephrasing the original content without sufficient change can still constitute plagiarism, especially if the original author’s contribution is not properly acknowledged or the rephrased content is not adequately distinct.

Paraphrasing plagiarism is a common issue in academic work, and it can be tricky to identify because it may seem like the student is doing their own work, but the core ideas are simply borrowed from the original source without appropriate transformation. For it to not be considered plagiarism, the student would need to substantially rewrite the ideas in a more original manner and attribute the concepts to the original author.

Scroll to Top