Change blindness demonstrates that, contrary to our intuitions, one is Select one: conscious of all that happens to fall upon the eye the retina cannot perceive a stablized retinal image aware of everything composing the visual scene substantially less aware of the objects composing a visual scene Which is an example of empirical support-rather than theoretical support-for the hypothesis that yawing is contagious (ie., that people imitate yawning automatically)? Select one: because all behavior is imitable, yawning too, should be imitable theoretically, observational learning must depend in part on imitation on average, people imitate yawning 80% of the time based on a hypothesis, yawning should occur when people are under-aroused
The Correct Answer and Explanation is :
Question 1: Change Blindness
Correct Answer: substantially less aware of the objects composing a visual scene
Explanation:
Change blindness demonstrates that individuals do not notice significant changes in a visual scene when those changes coincide with a brief visual disruption, such as a blink or a screen flicker. This phenomenon reveals that our conscious awareness of the visual scene is much more limited than we intuitively believe. Instead of being aware of everything in the visual field, we focus on only a small subset of the visual information, typically what we are actively paying attention to. Change blindness highlights the importance of attention in visual perception and suggests that without focused attention, changes in a scene can go unnoticed, even if they occur in plain sight. This finding underscores the limited capacity of human awareness and challenges the notion that we have a detailed and uninterrupted perception of the world.
Question 2: Yawning Contagion
Correct Answer: on average, people imitate yawning 80% of the time
Explanation:
Empirical support refers to evidence derived from observation or experiment rather than theory or hypothesis. The statement “on average, people imitate yawning 80% of the time” is empirical because it provides measurable data collected through studies observing yawning behavior. For example, researchers have conducted experiments where participants are exposed to videos or real-life instances of yawning, and the proportion of individuals who subsequently yawn is recorded. The consistent replication of yawning across different studies supports the hypothesis that yawning is contagious.
In contrast, statements like “because all behavior is imitable, yawning too, should be imitable” or “theoretically, observational learning must depend in part on imitation” are theoretical. They propose explanations based on logical reasoning or established theories of imitation, such as social learning theory. However, they do not directly provide observational evidence.
The contagious nature of yawning might be linked to empathy or mirror neuron activity, where observing another person yawning activates similar neural patterns in the observer, prompting them to yawn as well. The empirical finding that people imitate yawning 80% of the time directly supports this hypothesis by showing the behavior’s consistent occurrence.