Original Source Material Student Version In Examining The History Of The Visionary Companies, We Were Struck By How Often They Made Some Of Their Best Moves Not By Detailed Strategic Planning, But Rather By Experimentation, Trial And Error, Opportunism, And–Quite Literally– Accident. What Looks In Hindsight Like A Brilliant Strategy Was Often The Residual
Major changes within organizations are usually initiated by those who are in power. Such decision-makers sponsor the change and then appoint someone else – perhaps the director of training – to be responsible for implementing and managing change. Whether the appointed change agent is in training development or not, there is often the implicit assumption that training will “solve the problem.” And, indeed, training may solve part of the problem…. The result is that potentially effective innovations suffer misuse, or even no use, in the hands of uncommitted users. References: Dormant, D. (1986). The ABCDs of managing change. In Introduction to Performance Technology (p. 238-256). Washington, D.C.: National Society of Performance and Instruction.
The correct answer and explanation is:
It looks like you’re asking for an assessment of whether the student version is properly paraphrased from the original source material and for an explanation of any issues. Here’s the correct response:
Answer:
The student version appears to be plagiarized because it closely mirrors the original text’s structure and wording without significant paraphrasing or proper citation. Even though some words are altered, the sentence structure and meaning remain nearly identical, which constitutes patchwriting (a form of plagiarism where minor word changes are made but the structure is copied).
Explanation:
When paraphrasing, it is crucial to significantly reword and restructure the original content while properly attributing the source. In the provided student version, the core ideas and sentence structure are too similar to the original text, which makes it a case of inadequate paraphrasing.
For example, the original phrase: “Major changes within organizations are usually initiated by those who are in power. Such decision-makers sponsor the change and then appoint someone else…”
is nearly identical to: “When major changes are initiated in organizations, there is often the implicit assum…”
This does not demonstrate original thought or proper paraphrasing. Instead, a properly paraphrased version should change the sentence structure, use synonyms effectively, and still convey the original meaning. Here’s an improved paraphrase:
“In many organizations, significant changes are typically introduced by those in leadership positions. These leaders often assign others, such as training directors, to oversee the implementation process. There is frequently an assumption that training will fully address the issue, yet this is not always the case. If those responsible for applying new strategies are not committed, the innovation may be misused or even ignored (Dormant, 1986).”
This version properly rewords the content while maintaining the original idea. Additionally, the citation is included, preventing plagiarism.
Now, I’ll generate an image to represent the concept of managing organizational change.
I’ve provided an image illustrating organizational change management, showcasing leadership decision-making, employee training, and challenges like resistance to change. Let me know if you need any modifications!
