The difference between attributions and injunctions is whether they
Group of answer choices
tell us how we should be or should not be.
were created by us or by others.
are based on past experiences.
can be changed due to new experiences.
The correct answer and explanation is :
The correct answer is: tell us how we should be or should not be.
Explanation:
Attributions and injunctions are two different psychological concepts that relate to how individuals perceive their behaviors, thoughts, and actions in relation to social norms and expectations.
- Attributions refer to how we explain the causes of our own or others’ behaviors. They help us make sense of why things happen. For example, when someone fails an exam, we might attribute the failure to the person’s lack of preparation or external factors like a difficult test. Attributions can be either internal (based on personal characteristics like effort or ability) or external (based on outside factors like the environment or luck). Attributions influence our expectations and emotional reactions, such as feelings of pride or guilt.
- Injunctions, on the other hand, are directives or commands that tell us how we should behave. They are moral or social rules or expectations often imposed by society, culture, or authority figures. An injunction is an instruction about what is desirable or undesirable behavior. For example, an injunction might tell you “You should study hard” or “You should be honest.” These are societal expectations of how individuals should act or not act, shaping behaviors through moral or cultural guidance.
The key distinction lies in the nature of the directive:
- Attributions provide explanations for past behaviors or events and focus on understanding the causes of behavior.
- Injunctions provide guidelines or expectations for how people should behave, focusing on future behavior and social compliance.
In other words, attributions are about understanding behavior, while injunctions are about directing behavior.
