Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship requires the existence of
an enforceable contract, third party
select answer and select answer
Given these facts, the element of
select answer is missing from a wrongful
Interference with a contractual relationship claim. Given
these facts, St. Francis likely select answer:
liable for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
The correct answer and explanation is:
Correct Answer:
An enforceable contract, third party, and intent to interfere
Given these facts, the element of intent to interfere is missing from a wrongful interference with a contractual relationship claim. Given these facts, St. Francis is not liable for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
Explanation:
Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship occurs when a third party improperly disrupts an existing contractual agreement between two parties. The essential elements required to prove such a claim typically include:
- An enforceable contract – There must be a valid and legally binding contract between two parties.
- A third party’s knowledge of the contract – The interfering party must be aware of the contract’s existence.
- Intent to interfere – The third party must have intentionally caused one of the contractual parties to breach or terminate the contract.
- Actual breach or disruption – The interference must result in a breach or disruption of the contract.
- Damages – The plaintiff must have suffered measurable harm as a direct result of the interference.
In this case, the missing element is intent to interfere—St. Francis must have knowingly and deliberately attempted to interfere with the contractual relationship. Without evidence of this intent, there is no valid claim.
Since intent is a crucial element, if St. Francis did not act with the intent to interfere, they cannot be held liable for wrongful interference. Even if they knew about the contract, mere knowledge is insufficient—there must be an active attempt to induce a breach.
Thus, given the facts, St. Francis is not liable for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
Image Generation
I’ll generate an image illustrating the concept of wrongful interference, showing a third party disrupting a contract between two individuals.
