Compare The Theories Of Auguste Comte, Emile Durkheim And Karl Marx. How Do Each Theorist Explain Social Order, Stability And disorder ?
The correct answer and explanation is :
Here’s a 300-word comparison of the theories of Auguste Comte, Émile Durkheim, and Karl Marx, focusing on how each explains social order, stability, and disorder:
Auguste Comte, known as the father of sociology, emphasized positivism—the idea that society should be studied using scientific methods. He believed that social order and stability arise from a consensus on moral values and social institutions. For Comte, society progresses through three stages: theological, metaphysical, and scientific. Social disorder occurs when these stages are in transition, creating confusion and weakening collective beliefs. Stability is restored through the establishment of a “science of society” that guides rational organization and governance.
Émile Durkheim expanded on Comte’s ideas and focused on how social facts, norms, and institutions maintain social cohesion. Durkheim argued that society is held together by collective conscience and social integration. In traditional societies, this was achieved through mechanical solidarity—shared beliefs and similarities. In modern societies, organic solidarity, based on interdependence and specialization, becomes central. Social disorder, or anomie, arises when norms break down, often due to rapid social or economic change. Stability is maintained through moral regulation and functional institutions.
Karl Marx, in contrast, offered a conflict theory perspective. He believed social order is rooted in economic structures and the control of resources. For Marx, society is divided into classes—the bourgeoisie (owners) and the proletariat (workers)—whose interests conflict. Social stability under capitalism is temporary and maintained by force or ideology. True disorder stems from class struggle, exploitation, and inequality. Marx predicted that this tension would lead to revolution, overthrowing capitalism and establishing a classless, communist society.
In summary, Comte and Durkheim view social order as based on consensus and shared values, with disorder arising from normative confusion. Marx, however, sees order as imposed by dominant classes and disorder as a necessary catalyst for transformative social change.
