Which of the following is NOT a valid Lewis structure for the molecular formula C2H6N

Which of the following is NOT a valid Lewis structure for the molecular formula C2H6N? A: H – C – C = N – H (with H atoms and a positive charge on C) B: H – C = C – N – H (with H atoms and a negative charge on N) C: H2 – C – (C with positive charge) – N – H2 (with H atoms) D: H – C – N = C – H (with H atoms and two charges)

The Correct Answer and Explanation is:

The correct answer is: A

Explanation:

To determine which structure is NOT a valid Lewis structure for the molecular formula C₂H₆N, we need to evaluate each structure based on:

  1. Octet rule for atoms (especially carbon and nitrogen),
  2. Correct number of valence electrons,
  3. Formal charges, and
  4. Total atom count: 2 carbon (C), 6 hydrogen (H), and 1 nitrogen (N).

Option A:

Structure shows a carbon atom forming five bonds — one single bond with hydrogen, two single bonds with adjacent carbon and hydrogen, and a double bond with nitrogen while also holding a positive formal charge.

  • Problem: Carbon cannot have five bonds (10 electrons), as it violates the octet rule.
  • Conclusion: ❌ Invalid Lewis structure

Option B:

  • The molecule has two carbon atoms, and nitrogen is attached to one carbon and a hydrogen, carrying a negative charge.
  • All atoms obey the octet rule, and the total number of atoms matches C₂H₆N.
  • Formal charges are plausible.
  • Conclusion: ✅ Valid

Option C:

  • The central carbon has a positive charge, nitrogen is neutral.
  • Atom counts and bonding obey valence and octet rules.
  • All atoms appear correctly bonded with correct charges.
  • Conclusion: ✅ Valid

Option D:

  • Carbon and nitrogen are correctly arranged.
  • The nitrogen forms three bonds and a lone pair, carbon maintains four bonds, and the formal charges are plausible.
  • Atom count and electron rules are satisfied.
  • Conclusion: ✅ Valid

Final Answer: ✅ A is NOT a valid Lewis structure because it violates the octet rule for carbon, making it chemically implausible despite matching the molecular formula C₂H₆N.

Scroll to Top