In reference to David Zinczenko’s article “Don’t Blame the Eater,” examine the conflict that arises between personal responsibility and the need to protect the public. In this clash, what do you see as an argument that leads us past the conflict, and why is this path effective? David Zinczenko’s “Don’t Blame the Eater,” 647-650 (They Say, I Say: With Readings 4th Edition) 2018. They Say / I Say. 4th ed. New York, NY: WW Norton.
The Correct Answer and Explanation is:
In David Zinczenko’s essay “Don’t Blame the Eater,” the central conflict arises from the tension between personal responsibility and the public’s need for protection against harmful food practices. On one hand, critics argue that individuals must take responsibility for their food choices. On the other hand, Zinczenko highlights how the fast-food industry exploits poor labeling, lack of healthy options, and marketing tactics that disproportionately affect children and low-income communities. The path that leads beyond this conflict is the call for greater transparency and regulation within the food industry. Rather than casting full blame on the eater or the corporation, Zinczenko suggests a shared responsibility — where consumers are informed, but corporations and governments also take action to ensure healthier food environments.
This argument is effective because it balances accountability. It acknowledges that while individuals should make healthier choices, they cannot do so without adequate information or accessible alternatives. Zinczenko points out that many people, especially teenagers and families with limited time or money, often do not have real choices. Fast food is cheap, convenient, and heavily advertised, while nutrition information is either hidden or misleading. By advocating for clearer labeling, education, and better food policies, the article shows a way forward that supports both public health and personal freedom.
Moreover, this approach avoids the blame game. Instead of shaming individuals for becoming obese, it addresses the structural issues that shape unhealthy eating habits. Zinczenko uses his own childhood experiences to emphasize how limited food options can lead to lifelong health consequences. He appeals to logic and emotion, showing that protecting the public through better industry standards is not only fair but necessary.
In the end, the most productive solution is not choosing between personal responsibility and public protection but recognizing how both must work together to solve the obesity crisis.
