What conclusion can you draw from both of these ideas? A. The existence of the Loch Ness monster is still debated. B. Science can’t prove the existence of the Loch Ness monster. C. Over 10,000 people have sighted the Loch Ness monster. D. The Loch Ness monster is a myth.
The Correct Answer and Explanation is:
Correct Answer: A. The existence of the Loch Ness monster is still debated.
Explanation:
The most reasonable conclusion from the ideas presented is that the existence of the Loch Ness monster remains a topic of debate. This answer is supported by the combination of scientific uncertainty, eyewitness claims, and the persistence of the legend over time.
Option B, which states that science can’t prove the existence of the Loch Ness monster, reflects the limits of scientific investigation, especially when dealing with myths and anecdotal evidence. It implies that although investigations have been carried out, none have resulted in definitive proof of the creature’s existence. Science relies on empirical evidence and repeatable observations, and so far, the Loch Ness monster has not been confirmed through such means.
Option C points out that over 10,000 people claim to have seen the Loch Ness monster. This suggests a strong cultural and social presence of the myth and adds to the ongoing belief in the creature. However, personal accounts and sightings can be unreliable, subject to perception errors or influenced by folklore and expectations.
Option D takes a firm stance by claiming the Loch Ness monster is a myth. While many people do believe this, it does not acknowledge the ongoing discussions and investigations, nor the widespread reports of sightings. Therefore, it presents a biased or one-sided conclusion.
Only option A fully encompasses the complexity of the situation. It acknowledges that the mystery of the Loch Ness monster has not been definitively resolved and that people still discuss and argue about its possible existence. Some trust in scientific evidence and dismiss the creature as a myth, while others believe eyewitness accounts and support the idea that something unknown may exist in Loch Ness. Because of this ongoing uncertainty and difference of opinion, the correct conclusion is that the Loch Ness monster’s existence is still debated.
