A personality that consisted of only the ego and the id would be completely
illogical
selfless
rational
amoral
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is amoral.
In Freudian psychology, the id represents the primal and instinctual desires of a person, operating according to the pleasure principle. It seeks immediate gratification and operates without regard for reality, morality, or social rules. The ego, on the other hand, is the rational part of the psyche that develops to mediate between the desires of the id and the constraints of the external world. It operates according to the reality principle and aims to satisfy the id’s desires in a socially acceptable way.
If a personality consisted only of the id and the ego, it would lack the superego, the moral component of the psyche. The superego represents the internalized societal rules, ethical standards, and ideals, acting as a moral compass. Without the superego, there would be no sense of guilt, shame, or ethical judgment guiding the individual’s actions.
In such a scenario, the individual would be driven primarily by primal urges and rational decisions to fulfill those urges, but without any moral framework to evaluate the appropriateness or impact of those desires. Therefore, the behavior would be amoral, meaning it would be indifferent to moral considerations or ethical implications. The person might act impulsively or rationally, but their actions would not be guided by a sense of right or wrong.
This amoral nature results from the absence of the superego, which normally provides moral checks and balances. In such a state, the person might be entirely driven by self-interest and the pursuit of pleasure, regardless of whether their actions are harmful or beneficial to others.