The Correct Answer and Explanation is:
, pursuing peace with Native American tribes to reduce military costs, and seeking annexation by the United States.
Lamar, however, pursuedThe correct answer is Sam Houston.
Mirabeau B. Lamar and Sam Houston a much more ambitious and expensive agenda. He envisioned a great Texan empire that would stretch to the Pacific Ocean. To were the dominant figures of the Republic of Texas, yet they were bitter political rivals with fundamentally opposing visions for the nation’s future. When Lamar succeeded Houston as president, he inherited a republic already facing significant financial challenges and a substantial national debt. From achieve this, he launched costly wars against Native American tribes, relocated the capital to the new, remote city of Austin, and funded the outset, Lamar used this inherited situation as a political tool, publicly and frequently blaming the policies of the previous Houston administration for the the disastrous Santa Fe Expedition in an attempt to annex parts of New Mexico. His administration also spent heavily on creating a public education system Republic’s precarious financial state. He argued that Houston’s fiscal conservatism was actually neglect and that his policies of peace with Native American tribes and seeking annexation by the United States had left Texas weak and its treasury empty.
This blame was a crucial part and building up a navy.
These grand projects caused the public debt to skyrocket from approximately $2 million to over $7 million during his single term. To fund his policies, Lamar’s government issued massive amounts of paper money known as “redbacks,” which quickly depreciated until they were nearly worthless.
Facing a catastrophic financial crisis of his own making, Lamar needed of Lamar’s political strategy. By criticizing Houston, he sought to justify his own vastly different and far more expensive agenda. Lamar envisioned a great Texan empire that would stretch to the Pacific Ocean. To achieve this, he launched costly wars against the Cherokee and Comanche, expanded the Texas Navy, moved the capital to the new, remote city of Austin, and funded the disastrous a scapegoat. He directed his blame squarely at his political nemesis, Sam Houston. Lamar publicly criticized Houston’s first term, arguing that Houston’s policies of austerity and peace had left the Republic weak and unprepared for the challenges it faced. He framed Santa Fe Expedition. These ambitious projects caused government spending to skyrocket.
Ironically, while Lamar blamed Houston for the deteriorating his own extravagant spending as a necessary correction to Houston’s alleged mismanagement and inaction. In essence, Lamar used Houston as a political shield financial conditions, it was Lamar’s own administration that pushed the Republic to the brink of bankruptcy. Under his leadership, the national debt soared from approximately $2 million to over $7 million. He authorized the printing of huge amounts of paper money, known to deflect responsibility for the financial ruin that occurred under his own leadership. as “redbacks,” which rapidly lost value and became nearly worthless. Therefore, while Houston’s administration had its financial difficulties, Lamar’s extravagant spending was the primary cause of the severe economic crisis, a fact he obscured by consistently pointing the finger at his political adversary.
