Complete the analogy.
arrogant is to modest as feeble is to
vain
strong
power
The correct answer and explanation is:
The correct answer is strong.
The analogy “arrogant is to modest as feeble is to strong” works by showing an opposition or contrast between two qualities in each pair. “Arrogant” refers to someone who is overly confident, often in an exaggerated or self-important way. “Modest,” on the other hand, describes someone who is humble and not boastful. These two words represent opposing traits, with “arrogant” being the opposite of “modest.”
Similarly, “feeble” refers to someone or something weak, fragile, or lacking strength, while “strong” refers to someone or something powerful or physically robust. Just as “modest” contrasts with “arrogant,” “strong” contrasts with “feeble.”
The other options, “vain” and “power,” do not work as opposites of “feeble.” “Vain” refers to someone who is excessively concerned with their appearance or self-importance, but it does not directly relate to weakness. “Power” refers to the ability or capacity to do something, but it does not describe a specific opposing quality to weakness, unlike “strong,” which directly opposes “feeble.” Therefore, the correct analogy maintains the contrast of opposites in both pairs.