The Correct Answer and Explanation is:
The correct answer is C.
An omniscient narrator is an all knowing storyteller who has access to the internal thoughts, feelings, and motivations of multiple characters within a story. This perspective is often described as god like, as the narrator can move freely between different characters’ minds and reveal information that no single character could possibly know.
Option C is the clearest example of omniscience because the narrator reveals information from two distinct perspectives simultaneously. We are told about the speaker’s internal, private feeling of nervousness, which is a physical sensation he alone experiences (“felt his knees shaking”). Then, the narrator shifts to the collective consciousness of the entire audience, stating definitively that “no one in the audience even knew he was nervous.” To know both the speaker’s hidden fear and the audience’s complete ignorance of it requires a perspective that is not limited to one person. This ability to access the inner states of more than one character is the hallmark of an omniscient point of view.
In contrast, the other options display more limited perspectives. Option A is an example of third person limited narration. The story is filtered through Ting’s perspective; we see what she notices and know her interpretation of the situation. We do not actually know what her date is thinking. Option B is also third person limited, focusing exclusively on Vicente’s thoughts and resolve. We are inside his mind, but no one else’s. Option D uses a third person objective perspective, where the narrator reports only external actions and dialogue, like a camera, without revealing the thoughts or feelings of either the guard or the thief. Therefore, option C is the only choice that demonstrates true omniscience.
