CRJ 102- CHAPTER 6 EXAM QUESTIONS

PDF Download

CRJ 102- CHAPTER 6 EXAM QUESTIONS

Actual Qs and Ans Expert-Verified Explanation

This Exam contains:

-Guarantee passing score -15 Questions and Answers -format set of multiple-choice -Expert-Verified Explanation

Question 1: The Miranda rule applies during

A.) traffic stops B.) custodial interrogations C.) interrogations conducted after a defendant has been formally charged D.) all of the above

Answer:

B.) custodial interrogations Question 2: Before a confession can be introduced into evidence, the ________ rule requires

independent proof of corroboration that the crime has been committed:

A.) Corpus delicti B.) Habeas corpus C.)McNabb-Mallory D.)Quo warranto

Answer:

A.) Corpus delicti Question 3: Custody is not present for purposes of the Miranda rule when a: A.) suspect is questioned by a private detective B.) suspect is questioned by a police undercover agent posting as a fellow inmate C.) motorist is questioned during a routine non-arrest traffic stop D.) in any of these situations

Answer:

D.) in any of these situations Question 4: The source of the constitutional requirement that prevents the government from using the confession of an accomplice as evidence against an accused unless the accomplice

testifies at his trial is the:

A.) McNabb-Mallory rule B.) Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule C.) Sixth Amendment right to confront adverse witnesses D.) corpus delicti rule

Answer:

C.) Sixth Amendment right to confront adverse witnesses Question 5: Which of the following factors is relevant in deciding whether the defendant's confession was voluntary?A.) the defendant's intelligence B.) the defendant's prior experience with law enforcement C.) the existence of threats and false promises D.) all of the above

Answer:

D.) all of the above Question 6: Interrogation may resume after a suspect has invoked the right to counsel in all the

following situations except:

A.) counsel is made available B.) The suspect reopens the dialogue (after new Miranda warnings are given) C.) there is a 14-day break in custody since the day the suspect first invoked the right to counsel (after new Miranda warnings are given) D.) all of the above allow interrogation attempts

Answer:

D.) all of the above allow interrogation attempts Question 7: The following rule protects defendants in federal prosecutions against an unnecessary delay in presenting the suspect to a magistrate judge for arraignment: A.) McNabb-Mallory rule B.) Wong Sun rule C.) Corley rule D.) none of these answers

Answer:

A.) McNabb-Mallory rule

Question 8: Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches at this point: A.) when adversarial judicial proceedings are initiated B.) upon the issuance of an arrest warrant C.) when a suspect is read his or her Miranda warnings D.) when the suspect is booked into a detention facility

Answer:

A.) when adversarial judicial proceedings are initiated Question 9: The constitutional requirements for an admissible confession vary with the stage in the development of a criminal case at which the confession is obtained. The free and voluntary

requirement applies during:

A.) investigatory stops B.) custodial interrogations C.) interrogations conducted of a defendant after formal charges have been filed D.) all of the above

Answer:

D.) all of the above Question 10: Sam was arrested for burglary and taken to the police station. On arrival, Detective Johnson administered Miranda warnings. Sam stated that he understood his rights, and proceeded to sign a written waiver. After answering several questions, Sam said: "That's enough questions. I'm not going to answer any more." Under established Supreme Court

rulings, Detective Johnson:

A.) May ignore Sam's statement because he signed a written waiver B.) Must immediately end the interrogation session and wait 14 hours before attempting to question Sam again about the burglary C.) Must immediately end the interrogation session, but may interrogate Sam about a different crime after a reasonable period of time passes D.) Must immediately end the interrogation session and make no further attempts to question Sam about any matter unless Sam initiates further communications

Answer:

C.) Must immediately end the interrogation session, but may interrogate Sam about a different crime after a reasonable period of time passes Question 11: Miranda v. Arizona warnings warn suspects of the following: A.) Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination B.) Sixth Amendment right to counsel C.) Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection D.) a and b are correct responses

Answer:

D.) a and b are correct responses

Question 12: Which of the following is prohibited after a suspect has been indicted?A.) planting a police undercover agent in the defendant's cell with instructions to elicit information about the charges B.) discussing the charges with the defendant while his attorney is not present without obtaining a waiver of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel C.) outfitting a codefendant with a concealed tape recorder with instructions to engage the defendant in a discussion of the charges D.) all of the above

Answer:

D.) all of the above Question 13: The McNabb-Mallory Rule is based on: A.) the Fifth Amendment B.) The Sixth Amendment C.) the Fourteenth Amendment D.) The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Answer:

D.) The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Question 14: Miranda warning must advise the suspect of all but which one of the following

rights:

A.) the right to have an attorney present during the questioning B.) the right to a court-appointed attorney prior to questioning if the suspect cannot afford an attorney C.) the right to be represented by counsel at his trial D.) anything he says can and will be used against him in court

Answer:

C.) the right to be represented by counsel at his trial Question 15: An inadmissible confession may be used to impeach the defendant as a witness if: A.) defendant takes the stand and testifies on his or her own behalf B.) the confession was freely and voluntarily given C.) the story the defendant tells the jurors differs from what he or she told police or the defendant offers a statement that was inconsistent from the original one offered to police D.) all of the above must be met in order to use an inadmissible confession to impeach the defendant as a witness

Answer:

D.) all of the above must be met in order to use an inadmissible confession to impeach the defendant as a witness