FREE AND STUDY GAMES ABOUT FINAL FOR IP COM EXAM

PDF Download

FREE AND STUDY GAMES ABOUT FINAL FOR IP COM EXAM

QUESTIONS

Actual Qs and Ans Expert-Verified Explanation

This Exam contains:

-Guarantee passing score -51 Questions and Answers -format set of multiple-choice -Expert-Verified Explanation Question 1: rejection, negative impression, decrease in relational satisfaction, loss of influence and hurting the other person are all apart of____.

Answer:

risks of self disclosure

Question 2: ____ aims to get a desired response from others

Answer:

hinting Question 3: the attempt to protect a presenting image a person believes is being attacked

Answer:

defensiveness Question 4: a method for speaking your mind that expresses your needs, thoughts, and clearly and directly without judging or dictating to others

Answer:

the clear message format

Question 5: responding non-defensively to criticism

Answer:

identify methods of the clear message format Question 6: behavioral description, an interpretation statement, a felling statement, a consequence statement and an intention statement

Answer:

Elements of the clear message format Question 7: ha a second relational dimension, which makes statements about how the parties fell toward one another

Answer:

non-verbal Question 8: occurs when a communicator expresses a criticism or demand that threathens the face of the person at whom it is directed

Answer:

direct aggression

Question 9: effects of lies within benevolent lie

Answer:

lies threaten relationships Question 10: Benefits of self-disclosure, guidelines for self-disclosure, alternatices to self-disclosure, benevolent lie are _______.

Answer:

Parts of the Johari Window Model Question 11: the process of deliberately revealing information about oneself that is significant and would not normally be known by others

Answer:

self-disclosure

Question 12: essential ingredient in successful relationships

Answer:

verbal metacommunication Question 13: 1.initiating 2.experimenting 3.intensifying 4.integrating 5.bonding 6.differentiating 7.circumscribing 8.stagnating 9.avoiding 10.terminating

Answer:

Stages of Knapp's Stage Model of relational maintenance

Question 14: rewards-costs=outcome

Answer:

social exchange theory

Question 15: how are dialectical tensions managed?

Answer:

Denial, disorientation, alternation, segmentation, balance, integration, recalibration and reaffirmation

Question 16: avoiding, accommodating, and competing

Answer:

conflict styles Question 17: the parties lessen their dependence on each other, withdraw, and become less vested in the relationship

Answer:

de-wscalatory conflict spirals

Question 18: what are three powerful dialectical tensions?

Answer:

Connection v. Autonomy, Openness v. Privacy, and Predictablility v. Novelty

Question 19: identify the parts of the format, how to use it

Answer:

using the clear message format

Question 20: its character usually is determined by the way the parites interact with each other

Answer:

conflict is relational

Question 21: lose-win

Answer:

accommodating Question 22: describes tho ways in which communication can be more or less disclosing

Answer:

Altman & Taylor's Social Penetration Model Question 23: win-win, colloborating seeks a win-win solution to conflict. show a high degree of concern for both themselves and others. rather than trying to solve problems "my way" or "your way," their focus is on "our way"

Answer:

colloborating Question 24: when one partner violates the explicit or implicit terms of the relationship

Answer:

relational transgression Question 25: "the relationship," "the situation," "the other person," and "your goals"

Answer:

factors to consider which conflict style to use Question 26: an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incpmpatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from the other party in acieving their goals

Answer:

conflict Question 27: Are hints, benevolent lies, and equivocations eithical alternatives to self disclosure?

Answer:

some social scientists and philosophers agree, some argue that the morality of a speader's motives for lying, not the lie itself, ought to be judged, and others ask whether the effect of a lie will be worth it.