Test Bank For Exceptional Lives Practice, Progress, & Dignity in Today’s Schools 10th Edition (Complete And Verified Study material) (444pages) LEARNEXAMS

Chapter 1: The Purposes, People, and Law of Special Education Chapter 1 Learning Outcome Quizzes Learning Objective 1.1: Analyze the meaning of IDEA‘s preamble; describe characteristics of students (i.e., ages and disabilities) receiving special education services; and define special education and related services [Q1] What was one of the major findings of the Endrew F. Supreme Court case (2017)? 1. Students with disabilities have the right to a free and appropriate public education that is de minimis. 2. Students with disabilities have the right to an appropriate education that parents of children with disabilities pay for. 3. Students with disabilities have the right to a free and appropriate public education that is reasonably calculated to enable the student to make educational progress. [correct] 4. Students with disabilities have the right to a free and appropriate public education, but no school can guarantee a student‘s progress in light of their circumstances. [Feedback for Answer Choice 1] The Court ruled students need to make more than de minimis progress; this had been the ―law of the land‖ before Endrew F. The court raised the expectations of students with disabilities in this ruling. [Feedback for Answer Choice 2] Students with disabilities have the right to a free and appropriate public education. This means that parents of children with disabilities do not need to pay for their child to be educated, just as no other parent must pay to send their child to a public school. [Feedback for Correct Answer 3]