.png){kind=logo}
Border Patrol Practice Exam Latest Update -
110 Questions and Verified Correct Answers Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by Professor
.35 + .78 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 1.13
.69 - .14 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: .55
(3/7) * (2/4) = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 3/14
(5/8) / (3/4) = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 5/6
1/3 + 1/2 + 3/4 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 19/12
16% of 40 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 6.40
2.64 / .02 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 132
24 hours = __ day - CORRECT ANSWER: 1 day
25.164 / .06 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 419.4
4/5 - 1/3 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 7/15
5/8 + 6/8 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 11/8 1 / 3
57% = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: .57
6.021 * .4 = ? - CORRECT ANSWER: 2.4084
60 minutes = __ hour - CORRECT ANSWER: 1 hour
60 seconds = __ minute(s) - CORRECT ANSWER: 1 minute
A passenger purchased a vase from an art dealer for $1,210. She later learned that the dealer sold her the vase for 110% of its actual value. What was the actual value of the
vase? - CORRECT ANSWER: 1,100
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face- to-face or written formally.
What cannot be a Validly Conclusion?
- Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of investigations have
contained messages that would never be said face-to-face
- Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail
messages
- Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
- E-mail messages have not been exempted f - CORRECT ANSWER: A 2 / 3
A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged.
What is a Validly Conclusion?
- If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent
- If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
- If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it - CORRECT ANSWER: C
Active Voice or Passive Voice
She had been taking - CORRECT ANSWER: Passive
Active Voice or Passive Voice
She had taken; she had been taking - CORRECT ANSWER: Active
Active Voice or Passive Voice
She has been taken - CORRECT ANSWER: Passive
- / 3
.png)