BUSI 561 -Module 1 2 Latest Update -

BUSI 561 -Module 1 & 2 Latest Update - 200 Questions and 100% Verified Correct Answers Actual Exam Guaranteed A+ Brand

NEW!!!!!!!

• CORRECT ANSWER: Subject-matter jurisdiction is a court's power to hear certain

kinds of cases.

Actus reus - CORRECT ANSWER: wrongful behavior (guilty act)

Administrative law - CORRECT ANSWER: the collection of regulations, rules, and

decisions made by all these administrative agencies.

amendments - CORRECT ANSWER: Fourth

Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.Restrictions on warrants.Fifth Prohibition of double jeopardy.Right not to incriminate oneself.Right to due process.Sixth Right to a speedy and public trial.Right to a trial by an impartial jury of one's peers.Right to be informed of the accusations against oneself.Right to confront witnesses.Right to have witnesses on one's side.Right to counsel at various stages of the proceedings.Eighth 1 / 3

Freedom from excessive bail.Freedom from excessive fines.Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment.Fourteenth Extension of the right to due process in all state matters.Extension of most constitutional rights to defendants at the state level.

business activity - CORRECT ANSWER: occurs within the jurisdiction of state courts, business managers must also be familiar with the local city and county ordinances that govern matters not covered by federal or state codes, or that provide additional rights and protections beyond those in the federal or state law. These ordinances address important business considerations such as local taxes, environmental standards, zoning ordinances, and building codes.

Business Law - CORRECT ANSWER: enforceable rules of conduct that govern

commercial relationships. In other words, buyers and sellers interact in market exchanges within the rules that indicate the boundaries of legal business behavior.

Case Law - CORRECT ANSWER: the collection of legal interpretations made by judges.An alternative name for case law is common law.

Classifications of Law - CORRECT ANSWER: Private Law - disputes between private

individuals or groups. Ex: businessperson owns a computer equipment store and is delinquent in paying rent to the landlord

Public Law: disputes between private individuals or groups and their government. Ex: computer store dumps waste behind its building in violation of local, state, or federal environmental regulations, the resulting dispute focuses on public law.

Civil Law: rights and responsibilities found in relationships between persons and between persons and their government. It also involves the remedies available when someone's rights are violated. Ex: Jack-in-the-Box restaurant chain was ordered to pay damages after a two-year-old child died of food poisoning from E. coli. 2 / 3

Criminal Law: applies to situations in which someone commits an act against the public as a unit. Prosecuted by state or federal government.

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

-Contains all exec orders created by presidents - CORRECT ANSWER: The president

and state governors can issue directives requiring officials in the executive branch to perform their functions in a particular manner

Constititional Law - CORRECT ANSWER: refers to the general limits and powers of the federal and state governments as stated in their written constitutions. The U.S.Constitution is the supreme law of the land, the foundation for all laws in the United States.-primary authority for biz org relationships w/ the gov

cost benefit analysis - CORRECT ANSWER: a guide to legal change, choosing the legal alternatives that maximized the ratio of benefits to costs.

critical thinking - CORRECT ANSWER: What is the applicable law in this situation?What are the relevant facts—that is, what facts in this situation affect the outcome?Page 13When I apply the law to the facts, do the facts support all of the elements of the law?Therefore, what conclusion results? Recognize also that if law changes (e.g., civil fraud rather than criminal fraud) or if the facts are different, the conclusion may change.-Look for potential ambiguity in the reasoning.-Ask whether the analogies used in the decision are strong.Check the quality of the judge's use of evidence in his or her reasoning.-Think about the extent to which important missing information prevents you from being totally confident about the judge's reasoning -Consider the possibility of rival causes.Does the decision comport with Biblical truth?

• / 3