Instructors Manual with Case Briefs

Instructor’s Manual with Case Briefs for Criminal Law Justice Series Third Edition Jennifer L. Mo ore John L. Worrall 1 / 4

iii Copyright © 2021 Pearson Education, Inc.Table of Contents

Instructor Case Briefs Chapter 2

Court Decision 2.1: United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996). 1

Court Decision 2.2: Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989). 2

Court Decision 2.3: Glossip v. Gross, 135 S. Ct. 2726 (2015). 3

Chapter 3

Court Decision 3.1: People of the State of New York v. Decina, 138

N.E.2d 799 (N.Y. App. 1956). 4

Court Decision 3.2: State of

New Mexico v. Thomas Harrison, 846 P.2d 1082 (N.M. App. 1993). 5

Court Decision 3.3: Tyus v. State, 845 So.3d 318 (Fla. App. 2003). 6

Court Decision 3.4: People v. Lawson, 155 Cal. Rptr. 3d 236 (Cal. App. 2013). 7 Chapter 4

Court Decision 4.1: State v. James, 867 So.2d 414 (Fla. App. 2004). 8

Court Decision 4.2: Commonwealth v. Harry W. Leno, Jr., et al., 616

N.E.2d 453 (Mass. 1993). 9

Court Decision 4.3: Helton v. State, 624 N.E.2d 499 (Ill. App. 1993). 10

Chapter 5

Court Decision 5.1: State v. McClenton, 781 N.W. 2d 181 (Minn. App. 2010). 11

Court Decision 5.2: State v. Guevara, 155 Wash. App.07 (2010). 12

Court Decision 5.3: United States v. Le, 2009 WL 2947370 (E.D.Va. 2009). 13

Chapter 6

Court Decision 6.1: State v. Chism, 436 So. 2d 464 (La. 1983). 14

Court Decision 6.2: State v. Formella, 960 A.2d 722 (N.H. 2008). 15

Court Decision 6.3: Commonwealth v. Angelo Todesca Corporation,

446 Mass. 128 (Mass. 2006). 16 Chapter 7

Court Decision 7.1: State v. Reid, 670 S.E.2d 194 (S.C. App. 2009). 17

Court Decision 7.2: People v. Dlugash, 363 N.E.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1977). 18

Court Decision 7.3: United States v. Soto, 716 F.2d 989 (2d Cir. 1983). 19

Court Decision 7.4: United States v. Buckalew, 859 F.2d 1052 (1st Cir. 1988). 20 2 / 4

iv Copyright © 2021 Pearson Education, Inc.Chapter 8

Court Decision 8.1: Nibert v. Florida, 574 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 1990). 21

Court Decision 8.2: People v. Roe, 542 N.E.2d 610 (N.Y. App. 1989). 22

Court Decision 8.3: State v. Leech, 790 P.2d 160 (Wash. 1990). 23

Chapter 9

Court Decision 9.1: People v. Ireland, 188 Cal. App. 4th 328

(Cal. App. 2010). 24

Court Decision 9.2: Commonwealth v. Fettes, 835 N.E.2d 639

(Mass. App. 2005). 25

Court Decision 9.3: People v. Arias, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1428 (2011). 26

Court Decision 9.4: U.S v. Infante, 782 F. Supp. 2d 815 (D. Ariz. 2010). 27

Chapter 10

Court Decision 10.1: United States v. Monroe, 178 F.3d 304 (5th Cir. 1999) 28

Court Decision 10.2: People v. Torres, 184 Misc.2d 429 (2000). 29

Court Decision 10.3: Ferrara v. State, 19 So.3d 1033 (Fla. App. 2009). 30

Court Decision 10.4: United States v. Phillips, 477 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2007). 31 Chapter 11 Court Decision 11.1: Foreman v. United States, 988 A.2d 505 (D.C. App. 2010). 32 Court Decision 11.2: State v. Stallings, 158 S.W.3d 310 (Missouri App. 2005). 33

Court Decision 11.3: United States v. Zuniga-Arteaga, 681 F.3d

1220 (11th Cir. 2012). 34 Chapter 12

Court Decision 12.1: Helms v. State, 38 So.3d 182 (Fla. App. 2010) 35

Court Decision 12.2: United States v. Elie, 2012 WL 383,403 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). 36

Court Decision 12.3: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association,

138 S.Ct. 1461 (2018). 37

Court Decision 12.4: State v. Canal, 773 N.W.2d 528 (Iowa 2009). 38

Court Decision 12.5:

Dobson v. McClennen, 238 Ariz. 389 (2015). 39 Chapter 13

Court Decision 13.1: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010). 40

Court Decision 13.2: United States v. Abu-Jihaad, 600 F.Supp.2d 362

(D. Conn. 2009). 41

Court Decision 13.3: United States v. Walli, 785 F.3d 1080 (6th Cir. 2015). 42

Answers to Your Decision Text Exercises 43 Answers to End-of-Chapter Review Questions 49 Testbank 66 3 / 4

1 Copyright © 2021 Pearson Education, Inc.Court Decision 2.1 United States v. Virginia

518 U.S. 515 (1996)

Procedural History: The United States of America sued the Commonwealth of Virginia.The Western District of Virginia ruled in favor of Virginia. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded. On remand, the Western District approved a remedial plan and the Fourth Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Facts: The Virginia Military Institute (VMI), a state college, refused to allow women to attend the school. The United States of America sued the Commonwealth of Virginia alleging constitutional violations.Issue: Does VMI’s failure to admit women constitute a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States constitution?Holding: Yes. The exclusion of women at VMI is an Equal Protection Clause violation.Reasoning: Heightened or intermediate scrutiny applies to cases of gender discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause. The test requires that the gender classification serves “important government objectives” and the discrimination is “substantially related to the achievement of those objectives.” The exclusion of women at VMI fails to satisfy the requirements of the test.

• / 4