• wonderlic tests
  • EXAM REVIEW
  • NCCCO Examination
  • Summary
  • Class notes
  • QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
  • NCLEX EXAM
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Study guide
  • Latest nclex materials
  • HESI EXAMS
  • EXAMS AND CERTIFICATIONS
  • HESI ENTRANCE EXAM
  • ATI EXAM
  • NR AND NUR Exams
  • Gizmos
  • PORTAGE LEARNING
  • Ihuman Case Study
  • LETRS
  • NURS EXAM
  • NSG Exam
  • Testbanks
  • Vsim
  • Latest WGU
  • AQA PAPERS AND MARK SCHEME
  • DMV
  • WGU EXAM
  • exam bundles
  • Study Material
  • Study Notes
  • Test Prep

SOLUTIONS MANUAL - Copyright © 2024 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapt...

Testbanks Dec 29, 2025 ★★★★★ (5.0/5)
Loading...

Loading document viewer...

Page 0 of 0

Document Text

SOLUTIONS MANUAL

JAMES LAPP

BIOSTATISTICS

FOR

THE BIOLOGICAL

AND HEALTH SCI

ENCES THIRD

EDITION

Marc M.Triola Mario F. Triola Jason Roy 1 / 4

Section 1-1: Statistical and Critical Thinking 1

Copyright © 2024 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 1: Introduction to Statistics

Section 1-1: Statistical and Critical Thinking

  • The respondents are a voluntary response sample or a self-selected sample. Because those with strong in
  • terests in the topic are more likely to respond, it is very possible that their responses do not reflect the opinions or behavior of the general population.

  • The sample consists of the 1046 adults who were surveyed. The population consists of all adu
  • lts.

  • When asked, respondents might be inclined to avoid the shame of the unhealthy habit of not washing their
  • hands, so the reported rate of 70% might well be much higher than it is in reality. It is generally b etter to observe or measure human behavior than to ask subjects about it.

  • Statistical significance is indicated when methods of statistics are used to reach a conclusion that a treatment is
  • effective, but common sense might suggest that the treatment does not make enough of a difference to justify its use or to be practical. It is possible for a study to have statistical significance, but not practical significance.

  • No. Correlation does not imply causation. The example illustrates a correlation that is clearly not the result of
  • any interaction or cause effect relationship between per capita consumption of margarine and the divorce rate in Maine.

  • Yes, there does appear to be a potential to create a bias.
  • No, there does not appear to be a potential to create a bias
  • .

  • No, there does not appear to be a potential to create a bias.
  • Yes, there does appear to be a potential to create a bias.
  • The sample is a voluntary response sample and has strong pot
  • ential to be flawed.

    10.The samples are voluntary response samples and have potential for being flawed, but this approach might be necessary due to ethical considerations involved in randomly selecting subjects and somehow imposing treatments on them.

  • The sampling method appears to be sound. 12. The sampling method appears to be sound.
  • The Ornish weight loss program has statistical significance, because the results are so unlikely (3 chances in
  • 1000) to occur by chance. It does not have practical significance because the amount of lost weight (3.3 lb) is so small.

    14.Because there is only one chance in a thousand of getting such success rates by chance, the difference does appear to have statistical significance. The 92% success rate for surgery appears to be substantially better than the 72% success rate for splints, so the difference does appear to have prac tical significance.

    15.The difference between Mendel’s 25% rate and the result of 26% is not statistically significant. According to Mendel’s theory, 145 of the 580 peas would have yellow pods, but the results consisted of 152 peas with yello w pods. The difference of 7 peas with yellow pods among the 580 offspring does not appear to be statistically significant. The difference does not appear to have practical significa nce.

    16.Because there is a 25% chance of getting such results with a program that has no effect, the program does not appear to have statistical significance. Because the average increase is only 3 IQ points, the program does not appear to have prac tical significance.

    17.The sample percentage of males is 49.5%, and it appears to be very close to the percentage expected under normal circumstances. It does not appear to have statistical significance, nor does it appear to have practical significa nce.

    18.Because there is a 15% chance of getting such results with a medication that has no effect, the medication does not appear to have statistical significance. Because the average decrease is only 2 mmHg, the medication does not appear to have practical signi ficance.

    19.Because there is an 8% chance of getting such nausea rates by chance, the results do not appear to have statistical significance. Also, they do not appear to have practical significa nce.

    20.Because there is less than a 1% chance of getting the results obtained in this study, the results have statistical significance. They also appear to have practical significanc e.

    21.Yes. Each column of 8 AM and 12 AM temperatures is recorded from the same subject, so each pair is matched.

  • No. The source is from university researchers who do not appear to gain from distorting the data. 2 / 4

2 Chapter 1: Introduction to Statistics

Copyright © 2024 Pearson Education, Inc.

  • The data can be used to address the issue of whether there is a correlation between body temperatures at
  • AM and at 12 AM. Also, the data can be used to determine whether there are differences bet
  • ween body temperatures at 8 AM and at 12 AM.

    24.Because the differences could easily occur by chance (with a 64% chance), the differences do not appear to have statistical significance.

  • No. The white blood cell counts measure a different quantity than the red blood cell counts, so their differences
  • are meaningless.

    26.The issue that can be addressed is whether there is a correlation, or association, between white blood cell counts and red blood cell counts.

  • No. The National Center for Health Statistics has no reason to collect or present the data in a way that is biased.
  • No. Correlation does not imply causation, so a statistical correlation between white blood cell counts and red
  • blood cell counts should not be used to conclude that higher white blood cell counts are the cause of highe r red blood cell counts.

    29.It is questionable that the sponsor is the Idaho Potato Commission and the favorite vegetable is potatoes.

    30.The sample is a voluntary response sample, so there is a good chance that the results do not reflect the larger population of people who have a water preference.

    31.The correlation, or association, between two variables does not mean that one of the variables is the cause of the other. Correlation does not imply causation. Clearly, sour cream consumption is not directly related in any wa y to motorcycle fatalities.

  • The sponsor of the poll is an electronic cigarette maker, so the sponsor does have an interest in the poll results
  • .The source is questionable.

    33.The correlation, or association, between two variables does not mean that one of the variables is the cause of the other. Correlation does not imply causation. Common sense suggests that cheese consumption is not directly related in any way to fatalities from bedsheet entanglement s.

    34.The correlation, or association, between two variables does not mean that one of the variables is the cause of the other. Correlation does not imply causation.35 .The survey results are from subjects who chose to respond, so the results constitute a voluntary response sample. Consequently, the results are questionable.

    36.Because the nutritionists are paid such large amounts of money, they might be more inclined to find favorable results. It is very possible that the results represent desired outcomes instead of actual outcomes.

  • a.

0.45(3014) 1356.3

  • No. The actual count of survey subjects who have at least one chronic condition must be a whole number.
  • c .1356 adults (Any value from 1342 to 1371 would yield a percentage that rounds to 45%.) d.1206 / (1206 1808) 0.40, or 40%

  • a.
  • 0.828(198) 163.944 patients b.No. Because the result is a count of patients, the result must be a whole number.c .164 patients d.198 / (199 198) 0.499, or 49.9%, or 50% rounded

  • The wording of the question is biased and tends to encourage negative responses. The sample size of 20 is too
  • small. Survey respondents are self-selected instead of being randomly selected by the newspaper. If 20 reader s respond, the percentages should be multiples of 5, so 87% and 13% are not possible results.

    40.All percentages of success should be multiples of 5. The given percentages cannot be correct.

Section 1-2: Types of Data

  • The population consists of all drug tests of adults in the United States, and the sample is the 10 million drug
  • tests that were analyzed. The value of 4.2% is a statistic because it is obtained from the sample.

  • quantitativ
  • e

  • categorical
  • categorical
  • d.quantitative e.quantitative 3 / 4

Section 1-3: Collecting Sample Data 3

Copyright © 2024 Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Only part (a) describes discrete data.
  • The sample is the 36,000 adults who were surveyed. The population is all adults in the United States.
  • statistic
  • ratio
  • discrete
  • statistic
  • statistic
  • parameter
  • parameter
  • statistic
  • parameter
  • parameter
  • parameter
  • continuous
  • discrete
  • continuous
  • discrete
  • discrete
  • continuous
  • discrete
  • continuous
  • nominal
  • ordinal
  • ordinal
  • ratio
  • interval
  • nominal
  • ratio
  • interval
  • The numbers are not counts or measures of anything. They are at the nominal level of measurement, and it
  • makes no sense to compute the average (mean) of them.

  • The ranks are at the ordinal level of measurement. Differences between medical schools cannot be interpreted,
  • so there is no way to know whether the difference between Harvard and New York University is the same as the difference between New York University and Duke.

  • The numbers on the pain scale are at the ordinal level of measurement. Differences cannot be determined, so
  • there is no way to know whether the first patient has twice as much pain as the second patient. Ratios such as “twice” make no sense with ordinal data.

  • The temperatures are at the interval level of measurement. Because there is no natural starting point with 0ºF
  • representing no heat, it is wrong to state that the second patient is “5% cooler than the first patient.”

  • a. Continuous, because the number of possible values is infinite and not countable.
  • Discrete, because the number of possible values is finite.
  • Discrete, because the number of possible values is finite.
  • Discrete, because the number of possible values is infinite and countable.
  • Interval level of measurement. The direction of north represented by 0 is arbitrary, and 0 does not represent
  • “no direction.” Differences between degrees are meaningful; the difference between 30 and 60 is the same as the difference between 150 and 180 . But ratios are not meaningful; the ratio of 60 to 30 does not result in twice some direction. (These degree measurements are directions, not amounts of rotation.)

Section 1-3: Collecting Sample Data

  • The study is an experiment because subjects were given treatments.
  • The subjects in the study did not know whether they were given the magnet treatment or the sham treatment,
  • and those who administered the treatments also did not know.

  • The group sample sizes are large enough so that the researchers could see the effects of the two treatments, but
  • it would have been better to have larger samples.

  • The sample appears to be a convenience sample. Given that the subjects were all patients at a Veterans Affairs
  • hospital, it is not likely that the sample is representative of the population, so it is questionable whether the results can be generalized for the population of subjects with chronic low back pain.

  • The sample appears to be a convenience sample. By e-mailing the survey to a readily available group of Internet
  • users, it was easy to obtain results. Although there is a real potential for getting a sample group that is not representative of the population, indications of which ear is used for cell phone calls and which hand is dominant do not appear to be factors that would be distorted much by a sample bias.

  • / 4

User Reviews

★★★★★ (5.0/5 based on 1 reviews)
Login to Review
S
Student
May 21, 2025
★★★★★

The comprehensive coverage offered by this document helped me ace my presentation. A impressive purchase!

Download Document

Buy This Document

$1.00 One-time purchase
Buy Now
  • Full access to this document
  • Download anytime
  • No expiration

Document Information

Category: Testbanks
Added: Dec 29, 2025
Description:

SOLUTIONS MANUAL JAMES LAPP BIOSTATISTICS FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND HEALTH SCI ENCES THIRD EDITION Marc M. Triola Mario F. Triola Jason Roy Section 1-1: Statistical and Critical Thinking 1 Copyright ?...

Unlock Now
$ 1.00