WGU Inclusive Classroom OA Practice Test 14 studiers recently (1 review) Students also studied Terms in this set (47) Western Governors UniversityEDUC 2226 Save Personalized Learning for Inclusive ...55 terms csimmons2050 Preview D662 WGU- Personalized Learning f...84 terms ddjr28Preview Planning Instructional Strategies for...50 terms autumnmplummer Preview WGU D 46 terms Van When analyzing a student progress monitoring graph, the teacher could adapt an intensive intervention plan if?
- The students progress monitoring data (last four data
- The students progress monitoring data (last four data
- The students progress monitoring data (last four data
- The students progress monitoring data (last four data points) is below the goal
- The measurement is based on the curriculum and
- The learning environment is beneficial to the student.
- The classroom teachers are highly qualified.
- The student has been placed in the classroom.
- The measurement is based on the curriculum and grade level for the suspected
- Data from Tier 3 only.
- A measure that is difficult to administer and interpret.
- A single source to inform instructional decision-making
- Data collected frequently enough to inform
- Data collected frequently enough to inform instructional and tier placement
points) is above the goal line and has been collected for at least two weeks.
points) is below the goal line and has been collected for at least 15 days.
points) is below the goal line and has been collected for at least 6 weeks.
line and has been collected for at least 6 weeks.When planning for the progress monitoring of a student with a suspected learning disability teacher should ensure that?
grade level for the suspected learning disability.
learning disability.Effective progress monitoring includes?
for a student.
instructional and tier placement decisions.
decisions.
What conclusion can be made from analyzing the progress monitoring data for the student in the above graph using the four-point method? (Image reflects last four data points under the benchmark)
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student met the benchmark, the
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student has not met the benchmark, the
- The data indicates the student met the benchmark, the
- The data indicates the student has met the benchmark,
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student has met the benchmark, the
- The data indicates the student has met the benchmark,
- The data indicates the student met the benchmark, the
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student has met the benchmark, the
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is effective, and an instructional change is not needed.
instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instruction change is needed.
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instructional change is not needed.
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instructional change is needed.
instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instructional change is needed.What conclusion can be made from analyzing the progress monitoring data for the student in the above graph using the four-point method? (Image reflects all data points are above the benchmark)
instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instruction change is needed.
the instruction/intervention is effective, and an instructional change is not needed.
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instructional change is not needed.
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instructional change is needed.
instruction/intervention is effective, and an instructional change is not needed.What conclusion can be made from analyzing the progress monitoring data for the student in the above graph using the four-point method? (Image reflects last four data points far exceeding the benchmark)
the instruction/intervention is effective, an instructional change is not needed, and the teacher should consider a more challenging goal.
instruction/intervention is not effective, an instruction change is needed, and the teacher should not consider a more challenging goal.
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is not effective, an instructional change is not needed, and the teacher should not consider a more challenging goal.
instruction/intervention is effective, an instructional change is not needed, and the teacher should consider a more challenging goal.
What conclusion can be made from analyzing the progress monitoring data for the student in the above graph using the four-point method? (Image reflects two data points on the benchmark, one above it, and one below the benchmark)
- The data indicates the student met the benchmark, the
- The data indicates the student has met the benchmark,
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student has not met the
- The data indicates the student has met the benchmark, the
instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instruction change is needed.
the instruction/intervention is effective, and an instructional change is not needed.
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instructional change is not needed.
benchmark, the instruction/intervention is not effective, and an instructional change is needed.
instruction/intervention is effective, and an instructional change is not needed.These are the results of Moe's passage reading fluency probe. Which common reading error does Moe most often make, based on error analysis of his passage reading fluency probe? (Image shows Moe pronounced
the words: state as stat, drove as drov, time as tim, drive
as driv, games as gams, etc.)
- Long vowels/silent e
- Vowel teams
- Substitutions
- Omissions
- Long vowels/silent e
- 149 words read correctly
- 148 words read correctly
- 146 words read correctly
- 131 words read correctly
- 131 words read correctly
- Omar does not know basic number facts. He is unable
- Omar fails to understand regrouping. Either he does
- Omar fails to understand the place value. He writes the
- Omar performed the incorrect operation. He added
- Omar performed the incorrect operation. He added when he should have
During his RFP, Joshua read 149 words. He misread 14 words, added one word, and omitted three words. What is Joshua's reading score?
Which common computational error does Omar most often make, based on error analysis of his mathematics probe? (The image reflects Omar added the problems that were asking him to subtract.)
to add or subtract.
not regroup or regroups incorrectly.
answers in such a way that the numbers are not in the appropriate column.
when he should have subtracted.
subtracted.
Which of the following is a description of how an intervention addresses the student's academic needs including skill deficits and grade-level curricular standards?
- Strength
- Dosage
- Alignment
- Comprehensiveness
- Alignment
- Strength
- Dosage
- Alignment
- Comprehensiveness
- Comprehensiveness
- Station teaching
- One teach, one observe
- One teach, one assist
- Team teaching
- One teach, one observe
- Station teaching
- One teach, one observes
- One teach, one assist
- Team teaching
- Station teaching
- Station teaching
- Parallel teaching
- Alternative teaching
- Team teaching
- Alternative teaching
Mr. Sage builds several instruction principles including instructional strategies such as direct instruction, think- pair-share, cooperative learning, modeling, and graphic organizers into Lucas's intensive intervention. This is a description of which dimension of the taxonomy of intervention intensity?
In a general education classroom that has two co- teachers, the teachers are implementing a new instructional strategy to support a student with a mild learning disability. Which co-teaching model would allow the teachers to collect data for instructional decisions regarding the student?
The students with mild learning disabilities need to review content from the day's lesson to solidify their understanding. Which scenario would provide this review and have the smallest student to teacher ratio?
The teachers in the general education classroom are starting a new lesson that relies heavily on prior knowledge. A few students are struggling with the content learned in the previous lessons. One teacher instructs the students on the new lesson while the other teacher reviews the prior knowledge needed for the lesson with the small number of students who need additional support. Which co-teaching method is best used for this situation?