with Test Bank - 100% Original Verified, A+ Grade) Part 1: Instr...

Instructors Manual with Test Bank International Economics 18e Thomas Pugel ( All Chapters, 100% Original Verified, A+ Grade) Part 1: Instructors Manual: Pages 1-215 Part 2: Test Bank: Pages 215-714 1 / 4

2 © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC.Chapter 1 International Economics Is Different Overview The introduction to the subject of international economics has three major purposes: 1.Show that international economics addresses important and interesting current events and issues.

2.Show why international economics is special.

3.Provide a broad overview of the book.We begin with four controversial developments that show the importance of current issues addressed by international economics.The first controversy examines the economic effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic led to great harm to global health and millions of deaths. The global pandemic crisis also had global economic effects, including a swift, deep global recession in the first half of

• With the effects of the pandemic and the recession, international trade also collapsed,

declining by 8% in 2020.A surprising development was the difference in the declines of good trade and services trade globally. In previous global recessions, the trade decline was large for goods, especially durable goods, and small for services. But in 2020, the decline in good trade was smaller than the decline in services trade. Economists usually examine trade drivers through the demand for imports and focus on the roles of relative product prices and changes in real income. For goods, these drivers predicted a decline of 10%, but it was only 6%. For services, these drivers predicted a decline of 8%, but it was 25%.The COVID-19 recession was different from previous recessions in many ways. Two help us to understand why the predictions from the standard demand drivers were so wrong.Why did goods trade fall by less, even though lockdowns limited goods production and created problems for international transport of goods? The pandemic recession led to a shift in demand, away from services and toward goods, especially durable goods like electronics, furniture, and appliances. Trade in goods did not decline by as much as the standard drivers would predict.Why did services trade fall so much? Much of the shift in demand was a very large decrease in international travel and tourism, which declined by 80% in the second quarter of 2020 and remained at that much lower level through 2021.In a pandemic, access to medical goods is crucial. In the United States, access to imports from China became controversial. Of the four main types of medical goods, the United States was dependent on China for a large part of its total supply of personal protective equipment (PPE).China has a comparative advantage in producing PPE, based on its relative abundance of medium-skill workers.

Part 1: Instructors Manual

International Economics 18e Thomas Pugel (Instructor Manual All Chapters, 100% Original Verified, A+ Grade) 2 / 4

3 © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC.How did the United States end up short of PPE as the pandemic hit in March 2020? First, the pandemic had hit China in January, and Chinese exports fell off as demand within China increased. Second, U.S. stockpiles of PPE were low, in part because U.S. tariffs imposed on imports from China in 2019 reduced U.S. buying.With strong U.S. demand and limited supply, prices rose dramatically. That incentivized additional supply. For U.S. production, the U.S. government added subsidies to the incentives.But, increased U.S. production was not enough. The higher prices also incentivized Chinese and other foreign export producers, and U.S. imports increased. By early to mid-2021, the global shortage of PPE was resolved.Concerns about the availability of imports spread to other goods, especially those produced through sometimes complex global supply chains (GSCs). At their core, GSCs are also based on comparative advantage. To lower the cost of producing a final product, site each production step in its lowest cost location. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed GSCs to a range of risks including lockdowns and restrictions that cut access to components. How could production of the final products be made more resilient? Should all or most of the production steps be brought back (“reshored”) to a firm’s main country? Each business manages its supply chain risks, and most GSCs turned out to be more resilient than many initially feared. (An exception was automobiles, because the auto firms could not regain their access to enough semiconductors.) Reshoring sounds like a way to reduce risk, but it would actually concentrate risks in a single country. And, in eliminating international trade within the GSC, the gains from trade (discussed in Chapters 2– 6)would be lost.The economic effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic crisis appear throughout the rest of the

book:

•The trade collapse (Chapter 2) •Export restrictions on PPE and other goods (Chapter 8) •The decline and rebound of migrant remittances (Chapter 15) •The increases in the U.S. trade and current account deficits (Chapter 16) •Financial disruptions and increased deviations from covered interest parity (Chapter 18) •A large new allocation of SDRs and expanded emergency lending by the IMF (Chapters 20 and 21) •U.S. inflation rates first declined then went much higher (Chapter 22) •The U.S. fiscal response and the effects on private saving and government dissaving (Chapter 24) •Investors’ “dash for cash” in March 2020 and the expansion of central bank liquidity swaps (Chapter 24) •The EU suspension of national fiscal policy rules and its first large unionwide fiscal policy (Chapter 25) The second controversy arises from international migration, especially the increasingly vehement complaints about immigrants in many of the major receiving countries. In these countries, a rather large (10% or more) and rising percentage of the population is foreign-born, including many who are undocumented. Opponents accuse immigrants of causing general economic harm, 3 / 4

4 © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC.imposing fiscal costs as immigrants use government services, and increasing crime. International economics is often about emotional issues like immigration, yet we do our best to use economic analysis to think objectively about actual economic effects. In a preview of the analysis of Chapter 15, we highlight two key conclusions about the effects of immigration on the receiving country. First, as with many issues in international economics, there are both winners and losers in the receiving country. Second, we can determine the net effect on the receiving country. As we often conclude when we examine freer international exchange, the net national effect of immigration is positive according to the basic economic model, in this case even if we ignore the gains to the immigrants themselves.The third controversy is about Britain’s exit from the European Union (EU). A slim majority of U.K. voters in 2016 voted to leave the EU. While proponents of “remain” stressed the economic benefits of being part of the EU, proponents of “leave” stressed the need to reassert national control in such areas as business regulation and control of immigration. After the controversial vote, the process of leaving (Brexit) brought new controversies, because the vote itself said nothing about the relationship that Britain would have with the EU after Britain separated. A “hard Brexit” would reassert British sovereignty but would be very disruptive to businesses and markets. A “soft Brexit” would be less disruptive but would mean that Britain would remain subject to many EU laws and regulations. Britain formally withdrew from EU the in early 2020, and on January 1, 2021, the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement established a free trade area for goods. Britain had pursued a hard Brexit, and the EU had agreed. One feature has continued to be controversial. To prevent a hard border on the Irish island, Northern Ireland remains part of the EU’s single market. Instead, there is a customs border “in the Irish Sea,” dividing the United Kingdom.Chapter 12 presents the economics of a free trade area, as well as the evolution of the EU from a customs union toward a single market and increasing economic union. Nontariff barriers, which remain and are important in the new EU-UK free trade area, are discussed in Chapter 9.The fourth controversy is the exchange rate value of the Swiss franc. Many countries are skeptical of the exchange rate policies used by other countries, because exchange rates have effects that cross national boundaries, especially effects on relative prices that influence imports and exports. The United States has two laws, one more qualitative and one more quantitative, that direct the U.S. Department of the Treasury to monitor the exchange rate practices of other countries. These laws have seldom been used, but in late 2020 the Treasury Department concluded that the Swiss government was a currency manipulator. How did Switzerland, a well- regarded high-income, low-risk country, come to be so labeled?Before September 2011, Switzerland’s exchange rate policy was managed floating, and the exchange rate with the euro was key to Swiss international price competitiveness. With the beginning of euro crisis in March 2010, international investors shifted their investments to safe havens, including Switzerland. The Swiss franc appreciated against the euro, with the Swiss central bank sometimes intervening in the foreign exchange market to resist this appreciation.When the euro crisis intensified in mid-2011, the Swiss government shifted to a one-sided pegged exchange, in which the franc could not appreciate past 1.2 Swiss francs per euro. This worked well until early 2015. Under renewed pressure for appreciation, the Swiss government decided to shift back to a managed float (a very messy exit from the pegged rate). The Swiss

• / 4